IF YOU needed any proof, it has been delivered by CIES Football Observatory in its latest weekly report. English players simply don’t get a look in.
In its study of the top leagues and the number of domestically-born players appearing for the top division clubs, English clubs fare badly with an overall percentage of 35.7%.
The CIES tables are based on the number of minutes that national players have appeared for their club expressed as an overall percentage of appearances. In England, Watford are bottom of the table, with an astonishingly low 9%. Following Watford are Chelsea with 16%, Manchester City 17% and Arsenal on 23%. Only four clubs are above 50% – Everton (52%), Crystal Palace (53%), Burnley (62%) and Bournemouth (81%).
In Europe’s top five leagues, the story differs. France, despite the enormous wealth and drawing power of Paris St. Germain, only three clubs are below 50% – Nantes, Monaco and PSG. The Ligue 1 champions, at 35%, are still higher than over half of the English Premier. France, overall, comes in at 67.35%, the highest across the five leagues.
In Spain, 11 of the 20 La Liga clubs have a score of more than 50%, but Osasuna, at 97%, are the highest across the big five. Spain’s overall percentage of national players is 58.35%. Italy, meanwhile, has an overall percentage of 41.65%, with Sassuolo the most reliant on Italian talent at 86%. Germany just creeps over 50% with its total for the Bundesliga, with Freiburg the most “German” at 84%.
Europe’s most “national”-based clubs
|Club||League||% of nationals||Pos. in 2015-16|
|3||Atletico Bilbao||La Liga||91||5|
League champions 2015-16 and current use of national talent
|Club||League||% of nationals||Pos. in domestic league *|
|Paris St. Germain||Ligue 1||35||20|
*In terms of percentage of nationals
The least-reliant on local talent
|% of nationals||Position in KPMG European Elite EV|
It would be easy to assume that the clubs with more money are able to cast their nets beyond their own market to secure foreign talent and therefore, they are more likely to have multi-national squads. It is certainly true when you consider that the top 10 clubs according to KPMG’s European Elite paper record the following percentages: Real Madrid (41%), Manchester United (26%), Barcelona (41%), Bayern Munich (34%), Arsenal (23%), Manchester City (17%), Chelsea (16%), Liverpool (37%), Juventus (32%), Paris St. Germain (35%).
All of these figures are supported by the CIES list of expatriate players currently plying their trade in foreign leagues. Of the 500-plus Premier League players, 61.8% are expatriates. This is around double the total for France (30.5%) and way ahead of Italy (56.2%), Germany (46.8%) and Spain (40%).
The trend has been rising for some years and today, across Europe, the percentage of expatriate players stands at 38.7% with only 19.2% of current squad players reared through clubs’ own systems. Again, in England, despite clubs’ extensive youth schemes, very few players graduate through the ranks.
What do these figures tell us? Firstly, it confirms the problem England has, that domestic football has been bastardised to such an extent that the top teams are merely collections of hired guns lured by financial reward. The problem isn’t only England’s, but surely with statistics like these, the FA has to take notice?