National team football

Russia can easily afford to stage the World Cup, says UBS

RUSSIA may be one of the lowest-ever ranked hosts of a World Cup, but a successful competition will enhance its brand value as a tourist and business destination.

A new report by Swiss bank UBS, Investing and Football, notes that Russia’s low level of public debt, the second lowest among the 32 nations competing in the 2018 World Cup, means the country can easily afford to host the competition.

Although the cost of putting on the show come in at around US$ 12 billion (0.7% of Russian GDP), the World Cup comes at a time when the economy has returned to growth (1.5% in 2017) after two years of contraction. Russia’s economy is still in transition and has been burdened by sanctions and swings in the price of oil.

UBS doubts the Russian economy will greatly benefit from the World Cup, but believes that a trouble-free and well-run event will benefit the image of Russia in the eyes of the rest of the world.

Relationships between the west and Russia have deteriorated over the past few years and tourism lags behind countries like France, Italy and Turkey. In 2016, Russia was the destination for 4% of all international tourists and accounted for around US$ 8 bn of tourist receipts. The country expects around 1.6 million visitors as a result of the World Cup.

As UBS says, the economic benefit of the World Cup will only be realised in the future, certainly in the context of new stadiums, which will only demonstrate their value with post-tournament long-term use.

UBS doesn’t expect Russia to emerge as the winner, however, and ranks them around the 15th most likely team to lift the FIFA World Cup. The bank predicts that there is a 60% likelihood of Germany, Brazil or Spain winning the final and lists England, France and Belgium as the dark horses.

The report also says investors can learn something from successful football teams – qualities like agility, balance and calm. UBS’s analysts also see the competition as a chance for current issues to be put aside for the duration of the World Cup: “We hope the countries will use the tournament as an opportunity to build bridges.”

FIFA World Cup: Recent costs and profits

  Host spend FIFA profit Host(s)
2014 US$ 15bn US$ 2.6bn Brazil
2010 US$ 6bn US$ 2bn South Africa
2006 US$ 4bn USD 2.1bn Germany
2002 US$ 7.5bn USD 1.9bn Japan and South Korea

Source: GOTP

Photo: Zielonamapa.pl via flickr CC BY-SA 2.0

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.