A parachute helps Fulham and smothers Millwall

ANYONE who watched Fulham’s calamitous 2018-19 season probably felt there was no way the team constructed by the club’s owner and his son was “too good to go down”. Certainly, even if the players bought in the summer of 2018 – an example of scatter gun team construction – underperformed because of a lack of cohesion, Fulham’s record was still poor and relegation was on the cards from October onwards. It was a campaign of bad judgement, over £ 100 million of bad judgement.

It is therefore difficult to look upon Fulham and get the immediate feeling their current squad is far too impressive for most opponents. In football, there is always a danger that people fail to look beyond the Premier in forming their opinions about teams and players. The torrent of publicity and media exposure means the focus is all too often centred on the top clubs. Therefore, if a team gets relegated, there is a natural assumption that it is because that particular squad is not good enough for the top flight. If a team only narrowly gets relegated, it is reasonable to assume a decent promotion campaign can be launched, but Fulham were 10 points off the 17th-placed club, Brighton.

When Fulham hosted Millwall, the south London side were unbeaten and above a Fulham team that was clicking into gear after two wins. The visit of Millwall raised the security aspect of the game – dozens more stewards, a few police dotted around and a few anxious faces beneath the stand before the game and in the surrounding streets. Millwall’s reputation for being an army of hooligans is largely overstated and built on the past when mobs fought each other, although they seem to be the one group of fans who actually revel in being considered fierce and frightening. Hence they sing “no one likes us, we don’t care”. I naively followed Chelsea to Millwall in 1976 and went home a nervous wreck, vowing I would never return to the old Den. I didn’t.

However, it sounds strange, but a visit to the new Den is something of a throwback to the days when fans could create an unwelcoming, intimidating atmosphere that could put a visiting team off its game. I’ve actually enjoyed my visits to Millwall in recent years.

Millwall’s away following at Craven Cottage was noisy, as one would expect. Their single note yell, which seems to grow louder by the minute, is as chilling as the Zulu battle cry in the 1964 film starring Michael Caine. It was a bizarre experience – one half of the Putney End passive, ready to watch TV or cinema, the other a maelstrom. A tinder box waiting to be sparked. Some of the Fulham fans on the end of each row looked a little nervous, almost as edgy as the stewards and police that were keeping an eye on the visiting contingent.

Fulham’s fans were soon treated to an exhibition of football. Millwall started well, but soon faded. Once Scott Parker’s side quelled the Lions’ enthusiasm, they passed them to death. “We’ve got our Fulham back,” said one fan, referring to the team that won promotion in 2018.

Fulham’s Ivan Cavaleiro scores his side’s fourth goal

Fulham went ahead after 15 minutes when Tom Cairney set-up on-loan winger Ivan Cavaleiro who cut inside and sent his shot from the edge of the area past Bartosz Bialkowski. Cavaleiro, an impressive acquisition, crossed for Anthony Knockaert to score with a stooping header in the 32ndminute to make it 2-0. Millwall looked beaten at that point, but Fulham kept going with their possession football and intensive passing movements. In the 56thminute, they scored a third from the penalty spot, Aleksandar Mitrović being brought down and confidently converting the spot-kick. The goalscoring was completed by Cavaleiro, who controlled the ball well and rounded the keeper to slot home after 63. The Fulham fans lapped it up, a 4-0 victory that underlined their promotion credentials.

There was big gulf between Fulham and Millwall and people – particularly opposition fans – were assuming the home side’s financial clout was the big difference between the two sides. They saw the front line of Mitro, Knockaert and Cavaleiro as a sign that Fulham have far more money than Millwall. Of course, Fulham can afford to hire-in players like Knockaert and Cavaleiro, not least because they do receive compensation for being relegated in the form of parachute payments. In 2019-20, Fulham will receive more than £ 40 million, which may not buy many players, but could allow the club to be more than competitive with their wage bill. It’s strange that a club like Fulham is being looked upon as one of the big spenders, especially as they’ve always been South West London’s poorer relations (Chelsea on their doorstep, after all).

From a footballing perspective, Fulham’s performance was exhilarating. Millwall manager Neil Harris had to admit that his team had been hammered, “they were much, much better than us”.

The stats confirmed the chasm between the two teams – Fulham had 84.5% possession, an astonishing figure that someone like Pep Guardiola would have been proud of.

So the home fans were happy, singing “Super” Scotty Parker’s praise and putting last season’s misery into the memory bank. On the evidence of the first few weeks, Fulham are in for an interesting season. As for Millwall, they were unfortunate to come up against a team that is coming together nicely. Neil Harris said quite a few teams will get this type of treatment at Craven Cottage. He could be right.

@GameofthePeople

Photos: PA

4 thoughts on “A parachute helps Fulham and smothers Millwall

  1. The parachute payment for failure on the Prem. Should not just be stated as though it did not matter if the Premership wants to play fair then the so called parachute monies should be shared amongst all the teams in the Championship league one and two..then it old be a fair playing field and not give an unfair advantage to the teams that had failed the previous season in the Prem.

    1. We’ve spent nothing though – so how have we used parachute payments.

      We loaned out / released our huge earners freeing up vast amounts for wages.

      Please get factual proof before writing drivel like this .

      We won because we are purely a superior football team – a team assembled of loans and remaining squad members.

      1. How can you possibly know the parachute payment has not helped? This wasn’t a criticism, by the way – I am a Fulham season ticket holder. This is the perception the rest of football has about relegated clubs receiving cushion payments. Are you saying the £40m won’t get spent?

  2. Not only in football but within industry and commerce failure is rewarded to extremes, typical of the UK I am afraid. Fulham can keep their on loan mercenaries and I for one will not contribute to their welfare.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.