Why the BBC needs Gary Lineker

MATCH OF THE DAY was reduced to a 20 minute production without any commentary, punditry or studio chit-chat. It actually worked tremendously well, forcing the viewer to listen to the crowd, watch the action more closely and feel as though you’d just opened a window onto the game from an adjoining house or apartment. There was something quite refreshing about it and the BBC could steal a march by introducing an option where you can receive MOTD without any of the trimmings.

That’s not to say they are excused for their behaviour over Gary Lineker, who dared to suggest the UK government were out of order with their latest half-baked attempt to win votes over the global migrant problem. This subject matter has, for the past few years, been one of the great taproom debates, littered with inaccuracies, political editing and pure, shameful racism. Most rational people may share Lineker’s personal view over the Trumpian slogan “stop the boats”. The BBC may be acting like insurance companies who look for small print reasons NOT to do something, but Lineker was excercising his right to speak freely as a UK citizen. If his comparison with Nazi Germany hit a raw nerve, then the reaction has only fuelled issues over freedom of speech. The BBC is no different to many organisations, who have used an individual’s social media output as a reason to serve a dismissal notice.

The BBC are the losers because their treatment of the former England striker has once more brought the issue of the broadcaster into the public eye once more. As for Lineker’s ability, he is an excellent frontman for a TV show that has struggled to maintain its position in the footballing diet. Furthermore, he is one of the few former professionals that are genuinely worth listening to: intelligent, considered, humorous and honest. In a sport that is laden with cliché and jargon, he offers an alternative.

The quality of punditry in UK football is, generally, very mediocre. To many of the old pros are too close to the game in various ways, calling everyone by their first names, unwilling to criticise, too quick to use one of a long list of clichés to respond to every question. They must have so many splinters on their backsides owing to their penchant for sitting on that big five-bar fence. And, even more irritating, is their unshamed bias towards their old clubs. How many Jamie Carraghers can you from the employment agency for pundits that seems to deal solely on providing former Liverpool and Manchester United players? The viewers shouldn’t have to listen to squeals of excitement when the goals of their old clubs find the back of the net. There needs to be impartiality…oh, there’s that word again. 

Lineker knows the game and is articulate enough to present it professionally and with authentic viewpoints. While the BBC may say they have given him profile, Lineker has effectively saved Match of the Day in an age of increased competition and options. Lineker has given the BBC profile.

We don’t need obedient robots, afraid to express objectivity, if football presenters and pundits are there to enhance the offering, so many fall short of that goal. Gary Lineker will have no shortage of offers if he decides to leave the BBC, who are clearly in crisis and have lost credibility. What happened after this shabby affair has not only made them a laughing stock, however, it is another blow to the ailing reputation of a country where it is easy to assume nothing really works anymore.

4 thoughts on “Why the BBC needs Gary Lineker

  1. I can’t stand the big eared crisp muncher or his band of acolytes who serve as pundits. It’s like a lads night out with the accompanying crap jokes and I don’t watch it, although I occasionally watch MOTD 2 provided none of the above are on it. Last night’s serving was quite enjoyable.

  2. For years now I have recorded MOTD so I can just watch the highlights and fast forward through the banter and punditry. However, the issue has been badly handled by the BBC who appear to be responding to some external pressure.
    The current Government seem intent on diminishing Britain’s international standing with proposals like those Gary Lineker opposes while simultaneously running down the nations infrastructure and public services.

  3. I watched MOTD on Saturday 11 March, and I have to say I really enjoyed it without commentaries and pundits (including Lineker) pontificating. Just the football, noise of the crowd and hearing the players and ref. Brilliant – more please.

    With regards to Lineker and the free speech debate, I do agree that he should be free to say what he wants. Maybe the BBC should have nailed down a more thought through contract. BUT – perhaps it’s time people actually considered what he said.

    Comparing the UK to 1930’s National Socialism in Germany was crass at best, and frankly insulted our intelligence. Can you imagine how appallingly insulting this could be for Jews ? The UK is a very welcoming destination for GENUINE refugees – but as most of them seem to be young males just here to milk our Benefits system (and certainly NOT “modern slavery victims”) we should be taking a stand and sending them back. Pronto. The UK is relatively small so Lineker’s argument that we take in less than anyone else falls flat – we simply haven’t the room and our systems cannot cope.

    So Gary, instead of virtue signalling, think a little bit longer before you espouse these views that we are close to Nazi Germany in the way we treat immigrants.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.