Big clubs don’t care about the FA Cup?Nonsense.

JUNE 2, 2023: This season’s FA Cup final should be something special. A local derby will appeal to the fans, if not the players, with Manchester United eager to prevent City from winning the treble and also so show Pep Guardiola and his team that they are a force to be reckoned with once more. United have been suffering for a decade, cast into the shadows a little by the loss of their most successful manager, the rise of City and a succession of poor decisions. They want to win at Wembley, to complete their own double of two domestic trophies, repeating Liverpool’s 2021-22 success.

People continue to moan that the FA Cup doesn’t mean anything to the Premier League clubs, and yet since 1992-93, the competition has been won 26 times out of 30 by one of the so-called “big six” with only four winners from elsewhere – Everton (1995), Portsmouth (2008), Wigan (2013) and Leicester (2021). A total of 39 of the 60 finalists have finished in the top six in the Premier League. Of the 30 finals prior to 2022-23, 28 have been all-Premier games.

This season, the Premier League saw nine of its teams fall at the first hurdle, including Newcastle and Aston Villa, who lost to Sheffield Wednesday and Stevenage respectively. It is a fact that some Premier clubs send out weaker teams when they play cup ties, but they are invariably too strong even with a side of squad players. The Premier managers know that they can deal with the FA Cup with a few changes, such is the power of the league. Both City and United will field their strongest available selections at Wembley, even though Guardiola’s men have an even bigger occasion on June 10 in Istanbul.

Everton are still a big club, but how long can they be a heritage act?

IF any club needs to look closely at itself in the mirror at the end of 2022-23, it is surely Everton. For the second consecutive season, they have escaped relegation by the skin of their teeth, more by luck than judgement, and their financial performance continues to be sub-optimal. The timing of the club’s mis-management couldn’t be worse, for they have a bright new stadium taking shape across the city of Liverpool and to fall through the trapdoor could have been catastrophic. This is a club that can realistically claim to be among the top 10 in English football, by size, heritage and potential.

The fans celebrating “staying up” did so in relief more than with cork-popping hysteria and yet, everyone connected with Everton should be more than a little red-faced, not least the owners and the board. Countless people reminded the media in their post-match interviews that Everton shouldn’t be in their current predicament, but they have only themselves to blame. Furthermore, Everton may still have the scent of a “big club”, but the modern definition is not merely judged by having a big stadium, big support and a trophy cabinet full of prizes won 30 years ago. Everton are no longer a big club in the way that their neighbours across Stanley Park are, or indeed their rivals in Manchester and London.

They were once arguably one of the most influential and progressive clubs in football, but that time has long passed them by. Their last major prize was won in 1995, their most recent championship secured in 1987. They have their history, but it is becoming more and more sepia-tinted; the 28 years they have waited for another honour is the longest the club has ever had to endure. Everton would be classed as a second or third seed if the Premier League had such a system, but they can still regain the status they believe they deserve. In time.

What will be in the back of the minds of Everton’s fans is the experience of a number of former “big clubs” that have never climbed back or have never truly fulfilled the potential they feel they have: Portsmouth, Sheffield Wednesday, Birmingham City, Middlesbrough, Sunderland, among others. And then there’s the great under-achievers of the game, Newcastle United, a club that is going through transformation due to their change of ownership and elevation to quasi state-ownership. Both Chelsea and Manchester City were also in this bracket until the money arrived. The two clubs’ records of trophy winning are similar: Chelsea won eight of their 25 pieces of silverware before Abramovich flew into London, City won eight of their 24 prior to their Abu Dhabi takeover. Newcastle, for all their progress in 2022-23, have not experienced domestic success since 1955 and their last trophy was the old Fairs Cup in 1969.

Everton’s fans are entitled to be frustrated, but how can they compete in the new footballing paradigm? Clubs like Chelsea, Manchester City and Paris Saint-Germain have shown what seemingly unlimited wealth can do for a club, but that doesn’t make them popular – far from it. Rivals such as Arsenal, Manchester United and Liverpool continuously screamed “injustice” about the type of ownership that results in inflated investment, yet Qatar are possibly still hovering around trying to buy at least one of these clubs.

Ownership has become the new competitive differential and clubs wishing to keep pace will undoubtedly look for a similar form of backing. Everton fans want to “sack the board” and earlier this year, Farhad Moshiri put the club up for sale, but who do they really want to replace the current owners? Do they want to become the next Chelsea or PSG? We have seen, quite graphically, how fans can forget the issues they claim to be important at other clubs when a truckful of cash parks on the forecourt of their stadium. 

A New York-based sports investor, MSP Capital, which has stakes in other clubs including Augsburg, Brøndby and SK Beveren, among others, has been talking to Moshiri about a possible investment that could morph into a takeover. But would an owner/investor with multi-club interests enable them to be competitive with the elite? Chelsea tasted continual success under Abramovich’s regime and although the new owners have shown their commitment by playing fantasy football, the club is not the one elevated by the Russian’s cash and approach. There is a world of difference between owners who don’t need to make money and those that have been steeped in the culture of Wall Street or have a desire to build a portfolio of assets. Chelsea fans are only just seeing the start of this transition and they clearly don’t like it.

Whoever owns a club, the fans will warm to them and trust them if they believe the right things are being done. Relegation would have been very hard to take and, according to football finance expert Dan Plumley of Sheffield Hallam University, would have wiped £ 60 million off the club’s revenues literally overnight, the difference between Premier League TV money and the compensatory parachute payments. An added concern would have been the new stadium project, any potential investor may have baulked at the prospect of financial uncertainty. 

The past five years have seen a host of challenges for all football clubs, but since 2018, Everton’s income has dropped by 5%. In that same timeframe, it is easy to see who is growing among the elite: Liverpool’s revenues have risen by 30%, Manchester City’s by 22% and Tottenham’s by 17%. Everton’s 2021-22 earnings totalled £ 181 million, 30% of amount generated by Liverpool. More worrying are the accumulated losses: between 2017-18 and 2021-22, Everton have lost in excess of £ 400 million. Net debt also reached £ 142 million in 2022.

From the outside, Everton’s problems seem fairly obvious, but almost every aspect of the club needs close examination: ownership, player acquisition and development, team management and financial sustainability. Everyone has their own idea about the source of the problems, but in 2023-24, it is imperative Everton unite and move forward once more, otherwise the consequences could be dire. After all, nobody wants the club to have the best new stadium in the Championship.