Fulham and Charlton show why the Championship is so compelling

HOW OFTEN does a crowd filter out of a football stadium feeling they haven’t really been entertained? All too frequently, there’s a collective shrug of the shoulders, comments like, “not bad” or “they tried”, although supporters of the winning team console themselves with the result, a case of points over performance, function over form.

Not so the 18,500 people who witnessed Fulham against Charlton, a four-goal thriller that could have been won by either side. Fast, furious stiff, a little niggle here and there, and a couple of ejector seat goals. What’s more, the atmosphere was, at times, intense, boosted by a healthy contingent from South London, fans who are clearly enjoying Charlton’s return to the Championship.

Fulham’s form had taken a turn for the better again with two wins, against Wigan and Reading. When they faced Wigan a week earlier, they had not won for five league and cup games, now they are unbeaten in five, thanks to the 2-0 victory against the Latics and a midweek mauling of Reading (4-1). Draws can be destructive when you’re chasing promotion, but stick a couple of wins in a sequence and it suddenly looks far rosier. Charlton, meanwhile, had won half of their 10 league games and were sitting comfortably around mid-table, just one point behind Fulham.

A couple of years ago, Charlton looked like a very unhappy club, largely due to the fans’ dislike of Roland Duchâtelet, the Belgian portfolio club owner. Charlton were relegated to League One in 2016 and they spent three seasons at that level before winning promotion via the play-offs in 2019. The club was losing more fans than any London club in the previous few years, but there’s a sense of revival about Charlton at the moment, even though they are said to have the lowest budget in the Championship. They are averaging 18,000 at their home games this season.

Duchâtelet wants to off-load the club, but he’s asking £ 60 million, a figure that deters would-be buyers. He told the Charlton fans that he’s been trying to sell for two years, but pointed to the annual losses suffered by Championship clubs as a deterrant. “It has become unaffordable for nearly anyone to own a football club in the Championship, meaning it is not easy to find a suitable buyer.”

At least Charlton fans have a manager they like in Lee Bowyer, although he almost left in the summer after initially turning down his current contract. Bowyer started his playing career with Charlton before joining Leeds United in 1996 and also played for West Ham United and Newcastle United, among others. He’s the proverbial “one of our own” that fans love to crow about.

Bowyer has done a lot to unify the club during a fractious period at the Valley. Certainly, the mood among the Charlton fans at Craven Cottage seemed buoyant and positive. They were in fine voice throughout the 90 minutes, letting us know that they “hate Millwall” and that their club had won the FA Cup.

They had plenty to sing about in the first half as their team went in at the interval a goal to the good, a neat low finish from Conor Gallagher, scored after 41 minutes. Charlton had looked the better side for much of the first period, but Fulham improved considerably in the second half and equalised on 55 minutes with a superb strike from Ivan Cavaleiro. Fulham were level for less than two minutes as Macauley Bonne headed Charlton back into the lead. Finally, Aleksandar Mitrović scored from close range in the 63rd minute to make it two each. Both sides could have snatched victory, but it was Fulham that went closest,  Anthony Knockaert crossing and “Mitro”, who seemed to enjoy a robust afternoon, striking the crossbar. It was exciting stuff and kept the crowd interested right until the final whistle.

It does look as though the Championship is going to be a tight affair again this season, but Fulham, and their entertaining brand of play, should feature in the race for promotion. Charlton are not far away, either, although the 46-game programme will test them, but on the evidence of their draw with highly fancied Fulham, Bowyer’s side shouldn’t have much trouble keeping away from danger. This was a game involving two teams who were keen to play football and go for a result. It was 90 minutes that made you feel glad you had a Fulham season ticket in your back pocket!

@GameofthePeople

Photos: PA

State of Play: Charlton Athletic – a valley of stress

Charlton Athletic fans in the stands at the Valley Photo: PA

NO LONDON football club has lost as much support as Charlton Athletic over the past decade. Discontent fans and decline on the field of play have been accompanied by a 52% drop in match attendances at The Valley. Not even a progressive approach to ticketing has been able to prevent crowds falling to their lowest level since 1997. And the stress shows little sign of easing-up on the people who follow a club that has been part of the London football scene since 1905.

Ownership issues

Charlton Athletic is owned by Staprix NV, which is 95%-owned by Belgian businessman Roland Duchâtelet. He bought the club from joint-owners Tony Jimenez and Michael Slater, who had paid a “nominal” £ 1 for Charlton in 2011.

But much of the angst around Charlton Athletic concerns Duchâtelet. He is the main shareholder in five football clubs: Charlton, Carl Zeiss Jena (Germany), Sint-Truidense V.V (Belgium), Ujpest (Hungary) and AD Alcorcón (Spain).

Before Duchâtelet’s arrival, Charlton were on the brink of administration, struggling to pay wages and produce a playable pitch.

Since 2014, the club has been relegated and has lacked continuity. From Duchâtelet’s perspective, he is trying to make Charlton more financially secure, but the concept of multi-club ownership is controversial and the club’s fans have been unhappy at the way it is being managed. There have been protests, including a visit to Belgium and Duchâtelet’s home town. This is not the first time that the Belgian has experienced the anger of supporters – similar events happened at Standard Liege and resulted in Duchâtelet leaving the club.

Charlton’s fans are also very opposed to the club’s CEO, Katrien Meire, who was appointed by Duchâtelet. She is a Belgian lawyer and was involved with Standard Liege and provided legal advice to Duchâtelet in his takeover of Sint-Truidense, the club she supports. Meire has upset Charlton fans for referring to them as “customers”, along with her comments about “brand loyalty”.

The relationship between Charlton’s fans and the owner is best described as “strained”. The Charlton Athletic Supporters Trust was launched in 2012 as a vehicle for debate between supporters and the club. However, since 2014, collaboration between the trust and club has broken down. In February 2015, a public meeting was held after a period of great instability around the team management, with three managers in less than a year being appointed. The view was that the situation between the fans and owner was irretrievable.

Financials

One positive from the club’s 2016 financials was that bank debt had been cleared, for the first time since 1998. But relegation and falling gates have had a negative impact on Charlton, with a loss of £ 13.5m for 2015-16 versus £ 4m in the previous year. Matchday income fell by 9%, a consequence of lower crowds.

Total income amounted to £ 12.1m, up from 11.8m in 2015. The past four seasons have seen income range from £11.8m to £ 12.7m, but the losses have risen from £6m in 212 to £13.5m in 2016. A major contribution to this has been increased costs and expenses. In 2016, expenses totalled £ 21.2m, a reflection of higher wages as the club tried to stay in the Championship. In 2015, the total was £ 16.8m and in 2014, £ 10.4m.

In the transfer market, Charlton made little money in 2016 as they resisted player sales to stave off relegation, but in 2016-17, they sold Ademola Lookman to Everton for £ 11m.

On the field: No stability

Charlton Athletic was founded in 1905. The club has never won the Football League championship (top tier) but finished runners-up in 1937. The FA Cup was won in 1947, a year after the club lost in the final. After losing their status in the top division in the late 1950s, it was 30 years before they reclaimed their position in the first division, spending four years at that level. Since the FA Premier was established, Charlton have spent seven years in the first tier, the last ending in 2006-07. The past decade has been far less successful.

  Division Position FA Cup FL Cup
2007-08 CH 11 R3 R3
2008-09 CH 24 R4 R1
2009-10 L1 4 R1 R1
2010-11 L1 13 R3 R1
2011-12 L1 1 R3 R2
2012-13 CH 9 R3 R1
2013-14 CH 18 QF R2
2014-15 CH 12 R3 R2
2015-16 CH 22 R3 R3
2016-17 L1 13 R2 R1

Charlton’s decline has not been aided by a lack of stability around the management of the first team. In 2016-17, the club had three managers, Russell Slade, Kevin Nugent and Karl Robinson. The previous season, there were five. In total, Charlton have had 10 managers in three years.

Karl Robinson is the current manager and alongside the first team, the club has a youth academy that has prompted some enthusiasm. Only recently, the academy head, Steve Avory revealed that there were a number of young players who could be on the fringe of the first team squad in 2017-18.

Market share in London

Charlton Athletic is in the middle of the highly concentrated football area of south London, which also comprises Crystal Palace (11 miles from Charlton) and Millwall (six miles). The club is also just six miles from West Ham United’s London Stadium. There’s plenty of competition, notwithstanding the loyalty people have to their own clubs.

Invariably, in the metropolis, if clubs are unsuccessful, they run the risk of losing floating support that can easily transfer allegiance to another club. Charlton, as a “village” or neighbourhood, is quite small, with just 15,000 people. The club’s traditional fanbase has come from a broad area surrounding Charlton, notably Kent and other parts of the capital south of the Thames. Should any one club gain Premier League promotion among this segment of London football, such as Crystal Palace, that could be a drain on that catchment area.

The club’s home, The Valley, was once one of the biggest grounds in English football, with a capacity of 75,000 characterised by a vast bank of terracing along one side. Today, the ground has a limit of around 27,000. With crowds at little more than 11,000 that capacity is unlikely to be tested unless Charlton’s fortunes change. Charlton’s crowds when they were a Premier League club averaged 26,000 – their best gates since 1954.

Attendances 2007-17 – comparisons with local rivals

  Charlton Crystal P Millwall
2016-17 11,162 25,161 9,340
2015-16 15,632 24,825 9,108
2014-15 16,708 24,421 10,902
2013-14 16,134 24,375 11,063
2012-13 18,499 16,933 10,559
2011-12 17,402 15,219 11,484
2010-11 15,582 15,351 12,439
2009-10 17,606 14,771 10,835
2008-09 20,894 15,220 8,940
2007-08 23,159 16,031 8,669

Charlton’s share of support in south London has certainly declined. Consider that in 2008, Charlton’s average gates were three times that of Millwall and almost 50% higher than Crystal Palace’s attendances. In 2017, Palace’s are more than double Charlton’s and Millwall’s average is just 1,800 lower than crowds at the Valley. Charlton have lost 12,000 people per game since 2007-08, and coincidentally, Palace have gained 9,000 during that timeframe.

The club announced season ticket prices for 2017-18 at special low prices. Media reports suggested that 40% of season ticket holders have so far opted not to renew their tickets, which amounts to around 4,000 people. At £175, the tickets are the second lowest in the entire English Football League.

Social Media

Charlton has 112,000 followers on twitter and 204,000 on facebook.

Outlook: Continued stress

London clubs have to live alongside the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal, Tottenham and West Ham United, so competition is intense. For Charlton, having Crystal Palace and Millwall on their doorstep adds to competitive pressure.

In the past 10 years, the club has gone from the Premier to mid-League One. It is questionable if Charlton can realistically return to the lofty heights of the Premier in the medium-term, but more of a concern has to be whether they can climb out of League One.

The future is uncertain for Charlton – a fractious relationship between owner and fans, falling gates, underperformance on the pitch and strained finances all contribute to a worrying outlook for the club.

But Charlton have been here before. This is a club that recovered from losing its ancestral home, The Valley, in the 1980s, but returned home 25 years ago. That was a heart-warming story for all football fans.

Charlton needs to repair links between the ownership and the supporters – this is a prerequisite for future progress given the alarming decline in attendances. The question is, do all stakeholders appreciate the seriousness of the situation?

There were rumours that Duchâtelet might sell to an Australian consortium, but a fresh row erupted at the beginning of June 2017 when a leaked document revealed that The Valley was valued and assessed for property development.

More trouble appears to be on the horizon for this fine old club and the near-term looks set to be characterised by more battles between a dwindling audience and a Belgium-based owner.  We can only hope that the end game produces a result that is satisfactory for the people who follow Charlton Athletic.

Southend – sea, sand and success

southend-united_crowd_dec_31_2017

SOUTHEND used to be all about the “lights”, jellied eels, the nightlife, “kiss me quick” hats and a paddle in the freezing cold sea. From a football perspective, Southend played on Friday nights and they had one Billy Best in their line-up. The Kursaal, an amusement park, once played host to legendary rock bands like Queen, Deep Purple, Mott the Hoople and Black Sabbath.

Roots Hall is one of those old fashioned football grounds that used to proliferate the third and fourth divisions of the old Football League structure. Big floodlights that can be used as pointers to the ground’s location and barn-style stands. It still has a somewhat homely feel to it, in an austere 1950s way. Southend’s home since 1955, it looks set to be consigned to history when the club moves to a proposed new site at Fossetts Farm. Roots Hall is surely a housing estate waiting to happen.

It won’t be the only new building going up in Southend in the coming years, for there’s a redevelopment plan in process called the SCAAP (Southend Central Area Action Plan), which will change the face of the town centre and seafront. At present, around 18% of retail units in the centre are empty. Like many towns in 21st century Britain, there appears to be a problem in adapting to changing consumer patterns.

A new stadium for Southend United will offer the chance for the club to step-up a gear but not everyone is happy about the prospect. There are plans for a shopping centre and considerable housing, but critics of the scheme suggest that this would be the death knell for the town centre.

Southend-on-sea, like many seaside resorts, has suffered from shifting demographics. It has a population of 178,000 and it is relatively close to London. It’s a densely populated area and many of its occupants are former Londoners or have London ancestry. It is therefore a town ripe for football.

Fossetts Farm will include a 20,000-plus stadium that will be less than two miles away from Roots Hall. Like many clubs that have moved to new sites, it could result in increased interest in Southend United and perhaps bigger crowds. Forty years ago, Southend were averaging 5,500 at their home games, in 2016-17, gates are around 6,600. When Southend reached the Championship, they pulled in 10,000 per game, which shows that there’s potential to move the needle.

Southend United are enjoying a good season in 2016-17. Before meeting Charlton Athletic on New Year’s Eve, they hadn’t lost in Football League One since October 8. They had a poor start to the campaign, losing their first two games, but they recovered and mounted a challenge at the top of the table.  The locals are starting to believe they might have a chance of the play-offs and the crowds are steadily growing again – 8,500 saw them beat AFC Wimbledon 3-0 and for this game, Roots Hall was almost at capacity – 10,329.

Charlton brought plenty of support from South London. They’ve taken their time to adjust to life in League One after relegation but they gave new manager Karl Robinson his first victory when they won 1-0 at MK Dons on Boxing Day. That must have been bitter-sweet for Robinson as he was sacked by the new town club in October. Ironically, Robinson’s last 90 minutes in charge in Milton Keynes was a 0-3 home defeat at the hands of Southend – a game that was covered by Game of the People.

Roots Hall is a friendly place and there’s no airs and graces about it. It was interesting to see comedian Jim Davidson in the next box to our party. He’s a lifelong fan of the club and even named one of his stand-up tours, “Charlton Nil”.

That’s exactly what the score was for much of the afternoon. Southend, playing some lively football, led at the interval 1-0, their goal coming after 12 minutes from Simon Cox, who shot home from close range with a left-foot drive into the top right-hand corner of the net.

Southend almost went two ahead on the hour when Stephen McLaughlin struck the woodwork with a shot from the edge of the area. But there were signs of a Charlton revival and in a purple patch, Fredrik Ulvestad and Morgan Fox were both denied by superb saves from Southend keeper Ted Smith. Then Charlton’s Joe Aribo hit the bar with a fierce effort from the right hand side of the area. You started to wonder if Southend had done enough to win the game and on 89 minutes, the answer came – Aribo crossed and Andrew Crofts shot high into the net, a lovely finish to make it 1-1, the final score.

In the end, it had been an entertaining 90 minutes and a decent atmosphere. The point keeps Southend’s run bubbling along, but the draw was about right – and even Phil Brown agreed with that in his post-match analysis.

What was evident at Roots Hall was the buzz that traditional stadiums can still create. That is the challenge for all new ground developments. While new homes that meet modern requirements are the way ahead, you cannot beat the hum of an old English football ground. It was good to return to Roots Hall before it disappears.

http://www.gameofthepeople.com